La formación de individuos biológicos

argumentos para un pluralismo epistémico

Autores/as

  • Francisco Javier Navarro Cárdenas Instituto de Parasitología - Facultad de Medicina, Universidad Austral de Chile

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18270/rcfc.v21i42.3502

Palabras clave:

individualidad biológica, organismos, pluralismo epistémico, pregunta empírica, monismo, pregunta ontológica, representación científica

Resumen

La biología divide la naturaleza en una pluralidad de entidades individuales (como genes, células, virus, organismos, especies). El llamado problema de la individualidad biológica puede definirse por dos preguntas centrales. Una pregunta empírica destinada a explicar cómo y por qué una colección de entidades biológicas puede conformar un individuo y una pregunta ontológica que busca responder qué es un individuo biológico en general. En esta investigación abordaré la pregunta empírica desde una aproximación pluralista y epistémica. Argumentaré que la diversidad de criterios y prácticas utilizados por la biología para individuar la naturaleza no es un estado transitorio de la investigación científica y debería conservarse.  

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.

Biografía del autor/a

Francisco Javier Navarro Cárdenas , Instituto de Parasitología - Facultad de Medicina, Universidad Austral de Chile

Trabajo en filosofía de la biología y también me desempeño como docente universitario en el área de parasitología clínica. Soy tecnólogo médico de profesión con Magister en Filosofía por la Universidad de Chile.

Referencias bibliográficas

Allendorf, Fred y Gordon Luikart. Conservation and the Genetics of Populations. Hoboken: Blackwell Publishing, 2007.

Bedau, Mark A. y Carol E. Cleland. The Nature of Life: Classical and Contemporary Perspectives from Philosophy and Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010.

Bonner, John Tyler. First Signals. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2000.

______. “Foreword: The Evolution of Multicellularity”. Multicellularity: Origins and Evolution. Eds. Karl J. Niklas y Stuart A. Newman. Cambridge: MIT Press, 2016. xi-xix.

Bouchard, Frédéric y Philippe Huneman. From Groups to Individuals: Evolution and Emerging Individuality. Cambridge: MIT Press, 2013.

Brigandt, Ingo. “Beyond Reduction and Pluralism: Toward an Epistemology of Explanatory Integration in Biology”. Erkenntnis 73.3 (2010): 295-311. <https://doi.org/10.1007/s10670-010-9233-3>

Buss, Leo W. The Evolution of Individuality. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1987.

Carthey, Alexandra J. R. et ál. “Conserving the Holobiont”. Functional Ecology 34.4 (2020): 764-776. <https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2435.13504>

Cartwright, Nancy. “Do the Laws of Physics State the Facts?” Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 61.1-2 (1980): 75-84. <https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0114.1980.tb00005.x>

______. How the Laws of Physics Lie. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1983.

______. The Dappled World: A Study of the Boundaries of Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999.

Chang, Hasok. Is Water H2O? Evidence, Realism and Pluralism. Berlin: Springer Science & Business Media, 2012.

Cheung, Tobias. “What Is an ‘Organism’? On the Occurrence of a New Term and its Conceptual Transformations 1680-1850”. History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences 32.2-3 (2010): 155-194.

Clarke, Ellen. “The Problem of Biological Individuality”. Biological Theory 5.4 (2010): 312-325. <https://doi.org/10.1162/BIOT_a_00068>

______. “The Multiple Realizability of Biological Individuals”. Journal of Philosophy 110.8 (2013): 413-435.

Coates, David J. et ál. “Genetic Diversity and Conservation Units: Dealing with the Species-Population Continuum in the Age of Genomics”. Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution 6.165 (2018). <https://doi.org/10.3389/fevo.2018.00165>

Dawkins, Richard. The Selfish Gene. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1976.

Dupré, John. The Disorder of Things: Metaphysical Foundations of the Disunity of Science. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1993.

______. Processes of Life: Essays in the Philosophy of Biology. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012.

Ereshefsky, Mark. “Eliminative Pluralism”. Philosophy of Science 59.4 (1992): 671-690. <http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/289701>

Ghiselin, Michael T. “A Radical Solution to the Species Problem”. Systematic Zoology 23.4 (1974): 536-544. <http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2412471>

Giere, Ronald. Scientific Perspectivism. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2006a.

______. “Perspectival Pluralism”. Scientific Pluralism. Eds. Stephen H. Kellert, Helen E. Longino y C. Kenneth Waters. Minnesota: University of Minnesota Press, 2006b. 26-41.

Godfrey-Smith, Peter. “Abstractions, Idealizations, and Evolutionary Biology”. Mapping the Future of Biology. Eds. Anouk Barberousse, Michel Morange y Thomas Pradeu. Berlin: Springer, 2009. 47-56.

______. “Darwinian Individuals”. From Groups to Individuals: Evolution and Emerging Individuality. Eds. Frédéric Bouchard y Philippe Huneman. Cambridge: MIT Press, 2013. 17-36.

______. Philosophy of Biology. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2014.

Gould, Stephen Jay. Wonderful Life: The Burgess Shale and the Nature of History. New York: W. W. Norton & Company, 1989.

Hacking, Ian. “The Disunities of the Sciences”. The Disunity of Science. Boundaries, Contexts, and Power. Eds. Peter Galison y David J. Stump. California: Stanford University Press, 1996. 37-74.

Hempel, Carl y Paul Oppenheim. “Studies in the Logic of Explanation”. Philosophy of Science 15.2 (1948): 135-175.

Hölldobler, Bert y Edward O. Wilson. The Superorganism: The Beauty, Elegance, and Strangeness of Insect Societies. New York: W. W. Norton & Company, 2009.

Hughes, Kevin A. et ál. “Protection of Antarctic Microbial Communities – ‘out of Sight, out of Mind’ ”. Frontiers in Microbiology 6.151 (2015). <https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2015.00151>

Hull, David L. “Are Species Really Individuals?” Systematic Biology 25.2 (1976): 174-191. <https://doi.org/10.2307/2412744>

______. “Individual”. Keywords in Evolutionary Biology. Eds. Evelyn Fox Keller y Elisabeth A. Lloyd. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1992. 181-187.

Kitcher, Philip. “Gene: Current Usages”. Keywords in Evolutionary Biology. Eds. Evelyn Fox Keller y Elisabeth A. Lloyd. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1992. 128-131.

Krakauer, David et ál. “The Information Theory of Individuality”. Theory in Biosciences 139.2 (2020): 209-223. <https://doi.org/10.1007/s12064-020-00313-7>

Küppers, Bernd-Olaf. Information and the Origin of Life. Cambridge: MIT Press, 1990.

Lahav, Noam. Biogenesis: Theories of Life's Origin. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999.

Lidgard, Scott y Lynn K. Nyhart. “The Work of Biological Individuality: Concepts and Contexts”. Biological Individuality. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2017. 17-62.

Longino, Helen E. “Toward an Epistemology for Biological Pluralism”. Biology and Epistemology. Eds. Richard Creath y Jane Maienschein. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999. 261-286.

______. The Fate of Knowledge. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2002.

Losos, Jonathan B. Improbable Destinies: Fate, Chance, and the Future of Evolution. New York: Riverhead Books, 2017.

Love, Alan C. y Ingo Brigandt. “Philosophical Dimensions of Individuality”. Biological Individuality. Eds. Scott Lidgard y Lynn K. Nyhart. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2017. 318-348.

Mitchell, Sandra. D. Biological Complexity and Integrative Pluralism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003.

______. Unsimple Truths: Science, Complexity, and Policy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2009.

Mora, Camilo et ál. “How Many Species Are There on Earth and in the Ocean?” PLOS Biology 9.8 (2011): e1001127. <https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1001127>

National Research Council Committee on Metagenomics: Challenges and Functional, Applications. “The National Academies Collection: Reports Funded by National Institutes of Health”. The New Science of Metagenomics: Revealing the Secrets of Our Microbial Planet, National Academies Press (US). National Academy of Sciences, 2007.

Niklas, Karl J. y Stuart A. Newman. Multicellularity. Origins and Evolution. Cambridge: MIT Press, 2016.

Pepper, John W. y Matthew D. Herron. “Does Biology Need an Organism Concept?” Biological Reviews 83 (2008): 621-627. <http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-185X.2008.00057.x>

Pradeu, Thomas et ál. “Understanding Viruses: Philosophical Investigations”. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 59.1 (2016): 57-63. <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsc.2016.02.008>

Pradeu, Thomas. “Organisms or Biological Individuals? Combining Physiological and Evolutionary Individuality”. Biology & Philosophy 31.6 (2016a): 797-817. <https://doi.org/10.1007/s10539-016-9551-1>

______. “The Many Faces of Biological Individuality”. Biology and Philosophy 31.1 (2016b): 761-773. <https://doi.org/10.1007/s10539-016-9553-z>

Queller, David C. y Joan E. Strassmann. “Beyond Society: The Evolution of Organismality”. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 364.1533 (2009): 3143-55. <https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2009.0095>

Redford, Kent H., et ál. “Conservation and the Microbiome”. Conservation Biology: the Journal of the Society for Conservation Biology 26.2 (2012): 195-197. <https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2012.01829.x>

Robert, Jason Scott. “Evo-devo”. The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Biology. Ed. Michael Ruse. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008. 291-309.

Secretaría del Convenio sobre la Diversidad Biológica. Protocolo de Cartagena sobre seguridad de la biotecnología del Convenio sobre la Diversidad Biológica. Montreal: Secretaría del Convenio sobre la Diversidad Biológica, 2000.

Shannon, Claude E. “A Mathematical Theory of Communication”. The Bell System Technical Journal 27.3 (1948): 379-423.

Smith, John y Eors Szathmary. The Major Transitions in Evolution. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1997.

Strassmann, Joan E. y David C. Queller. “The Social Organism: Congresses, Parties, and Committees”. Evolution 64.3 (2010): 605-16. <https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1558-5646.2009.00929.x>

Trevelline, Brian K. et ál. “Conservation Biology Needs a Microbial Renaissance: a Call for the Consideration of Host-Associated Microbiota in Wildlife Management Practices”. Proceedings of the Royal Society B 286, 1895 (2019): 20182448. <https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2018.2448>

Umen, James G. “Green Algae and the Origins of Multicellularity in the Plant Kingdom”. Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in Biology 6.11 (2014): a016170. <https://doi.org/10.1101/cshperspect.a016170>

Waters, C. Kenneth. “Ask not ‘What Is an Individual?’ ” Individuation, Process, and Scientific Practices. Eds. Otavio Bueno, Ruey-Lin Chen y Melinda Bonnie Fagan. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2018. 91-113.

Wilson, David Sloan y Elliott Sober. “Reviving the Superorganism”. Journal of Theoretical Biology 136.3 (1989): 337-356. <https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5193(89)80169-9>

Wilson, Jack. Biological Individuality: The Identity and Persistence of Living Entities. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999.

______. “Ontological Butchery: Organism Concepts and Biological Generalizations”. Philosophy of Science 67.1 (2000): S301-S311. <https://doi.org/10.1086/392827>

Descargas

Publicado

2021-10-06

Cómo citar

Navarro Cárdenas , F. J. . (2021). La formación de individuos biológicos: argumentos para un pluralismo epistémico. Revista Colombiana De Filosofía De La Ciencia, 21(42). https://doi.org/10.18270/rcfc.v21i42.3502