¿Es compatible el realismo científico con el emergentismo ontólogico?
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18270/rcfc.v20i40.3236Palabras clave:
emergentismo, hechos brutos ontológicos, realismo científico, stances, racionalidadResumen
Se argumenta que la actitud epistémica (el ethos o stance) del realista científico - i.e., la búsqueda de explicaciones aun conjeturando inobservables, el querer minimizar el universo de los hechos brutos- es incompatible con aquella de un emergentismo fuerte u ontológico que se resigna a dejar como inexplicados y como inexplicables algunos fenómenos de emergencia, por lo que el realismo científico no es compatible con este tipo de emergentismo, uno resignado a la ignorancia. También se argumenta que la actitud realista es la preferible para la investigación científica, pues el realista científico apuesta por seguir investigando, por seguir perquiriendo.
Descargas
Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.
Referencias bibliográficas
Bedau, Mark. “Downward Causation and Autonomy in Weak Emergence”. Emergence: Contemporary Readings in Philosophy and Science. 2003. Eds. Mark Bedau y Paul Humphreys. Cambridge, ma: The mit Press, 2008. 155-188. <https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9780262026215.003.0014>.
Beuamont, Bertrand. “Hegel and the Seven Planets”. Mind 63.250 (1954): 246-248.
Bonjour, Laurence. Epistemology: Classic Problems and Contemporary Responses. 2nd. ed. Plymouth, UK: Rowman & Littlefield Publishing Group, Inc, 2009.
Cíntora, Armando. “¿Pueden los ideales ser racionales?”. Signos Filosóficos 10.20 (2008): 145-154. <http://www.scielo.org.mx/pdf/signosf/v10n20/v10n20a7.pdf >.
______. “El disenso axiológico entre realistas y anti realistas científicos”. Praxis Filosófica 45 (2017): 11-23.< https://doi.org/10.25100/pfilosofica.v0i45S.6063>.
Dennet, Daniel. “Real Patterns”. Emergence: Contemporary Readings in Philosophy and Science. 1991. Eds. Mark Bedau y Paul Humphreys. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 2008. 189-206.
Hempel, Carl y Paul Oppenheim. “On the Idea of Emergence”. Emergence: Contemporary Readings in Philosophy and Science. 1965. Eds. Mark Bedau y Paul Humphreys. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 2008. 61-68. <10.7551/mitpress/9780262026215.003.0004>.
Hendry, Robin. “Prospects for Strong Emergence in Chemistry”. Philosophical and Scientific Perspectives on Downward Causation. Eds. Michele Paolini y Francesco Orilia. London: Routledge, 2017. 1-14. <https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315638577>.
Humphreys, Paul. “How Properties Emerge”. Emergence: Contemporary Readings in Philosophy and Science. 1997. Eds. Mark Bedau y Paul Humphreys. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 2008. 111-126. <10.7551/mitpress/9780262026215.003.0008>
Kim, Jaegwon. “Making Sense of Emergence”. Emergence: Contemporary Readings in Philosophy and Science. 1999. Eds. Mark Bedau y Paul Humphreys. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 2008. 127-154.
Maudlin, Tim. “Philosophy of Physics: Quantum Theory”. Princeton Foundations of Contemporary Philosophy. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press, 2019.
McLaughlin, Brian. “Emergence and Supervenience”. Emergence: Contemporary Readings in Philosophy and Science. 1997. Eds. Mark Bedau y Paul Humphreys. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 2008. 81-98.
Oppenheim, Paul y Hilary Putnam. “Unity of Science as a Working Hypothesis”. Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science 2.1 (1958): 3-36.
Orilia, Francesco y Chris Swoyer. “Properties”. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Summer 2020 Edition). Ed. Edward N. Zalta <https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2020/entries/properties/>
Penrose, Roger. The Emperor’s New Mind. New York: Pinguin Books, 1991.
Prigogine, Ilya e Isabelle Stengers. “Order Out of Chaos: Man’s Dialogue with Nature”. USA, Canada: Bantam Books, 1984.
Searle, John. “Reductionism and the Irreducibility of Consciousness”. Emergence: Contemporary Readings in Philosophy and Science. 1992. Eds. Mark Bedau y Paul Humphreys. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 2008. 69-80.
Symons, John. “Brute Facts about Emergence”. Brute Facts. Eds. EllyVintiadis y Constantinos Mekios. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2018. 177-195.
Taylor, Elanor. “How to Make the Case for Brute Facts”. Brute Facts. Eds. EllyVintiadis y Constantinos Mekios. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2018. 28-44.
Wyss, Peter. “Emergence: Inexplicable but Explanatory”. Brute Facts. Eds. Elly, Vintiadis y Constantinos, Mekios. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2018. 213-233.
Beuamont, Bertrand. “Hegel and the Seven Planets”. Mind 63.250 (1954): 246-248.
Bonjour, Laurence. Epistemology: Classic Problems and Contemporary Responses. 2nd. ed. Plymouth, UK: Rowman & Littlefield Publishing Group, Inc, 2009.
Cíntora, Armando. “¿Pueden los ideales ser racionales?”. Signos Filosóficos 10.20 (2008): 145-154. <http://www.scielo.org.mx/pdf/signosf/v10n20/v10n20a7.pdf >.
______. “El disenso axiológico entre realistas y anti realistas científicos”. Praxis Filosófica 45 (2017): 11-23.< https://doi.org/10.25100/pfilosofica.v0i45S.6063>.
Dennet, Daniel. “Real Patterns”. Emergence: Contemporary Readings in Philosophy and Science. 1991. Eds. Mark Bedau y Paul Humphreys. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 2008. 189-206.
Hempel, Carl y Paul Oppenheim. “On the Idea of Emergence”. Emergence: Contemporary Readings in Philosophy and Science. 1965. Eds. Mark Bedau y Paul Humphreys. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 2008. 61-68. <10.7551/mitpress/9780262026215.003.0004>.
Hendry, Robin. “Prospects for Strong Emergence in Chemistry”. Philosophical and Scientific Perspectives on Downward Causation. Eds. Michele Paolini y Francesco Orilia. London: Routledge, 2017. 1-14. <https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315638577>.
Humphreys, Paul. “How Properties Emerge”. Emergence: Contemporary Readings in Philosophy and Science. 1997. Eds. Mark Bedau y Paul Humphreys. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 2008. 111-126. <10.7551/mitpress/9780262026215.003.0008>
Kim, Jaegwon. “Making Sense of Emergence”. Emergence: Contemporary Readings in Philosophy and Science. 1999. Eds. Mark Bedau y Paul Humphreys. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 2008. 127-154.
Maudlin, Tim. “Philosophy of Physics: Quantum Theory”. Princeton Foundations of Contemporary Philosophy. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press, 2019.
McLaughlin, Brian. “Emergence and Supervenience”. Emergence: Contemporary Readings in Philosophy and Science. 1997. Eds. Mark Bedau y Paul Humphreys. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 2008. 81-98.
Oppenheim, Paul y Hilary Putnam. “Unity of Science as a Working Hypothesis”. Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science 2.1 (1958): 3-36.
Orilia, Francesco y Chris Swoyer. “Properties”. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Summer 2020 Edition). Ed. Edward N. Zalta <https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2020/entries/properties/>
Penrose, Roger. The Emperor’s New Mind. New York: Pinguin Books, 1991.
Prigogine, Ilya e Isabelle Stengers. “Order Out of Chaos: Man’s Dialogue with Nature”. USA, Canada: Bantam Books, 1984.
Searle, John. “Reductionism and the Irreducibility of Consciousness”. Emergence: Contemporary Readings in Philosophy and Science. 1992. Eds. Mark Bedau y Paul Humphreys. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 2008. 69-80.
Symons, John. “Brute Facts about Emergence”. Brute Facts. Eds. EllyVintiadis y Constantinos Mekios. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2018. 177-195.
Taylor, Elanor. “How to Make the Case for Brute Facts”. Brute Facts. Eds. EllyVintiadis y Constantinos Mekios. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2018. 28-44.
Wyss, Peter. “Emergence: Inexplicable but Explanatory”. Brute Facts. Eds. Elly, Vintiadis y Constantinos, Mekios. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2018. 213-233.
