Realismo pitagórico y realismo cantoriano en la física cuántica no relativista
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18270/rcfc.v12i25.1658Resumen
El carácter fundamentalmente probabilista de la teoría cuántica cuestionó el realismo
como filosofía básica de la ciencia, si bien ciertas interpretaciones instrumentalistas
podrían no amenazar por sí solas la existencia de un mundo exterior e independiente
de nuestra conciencia. La falta de un valor definido para tales magnitudes antes de la
medición alentó la suposición de que tales valores “no existen” antes de la medida. Una
reinterpretación de nuestras ideas sobre las magnitudes físicas, considerándolas formalmente
representadas por conjuntos de valores en lugar de valores numéricos concretos,
ayudaría a disipar toda sombra de irrealidad física.
Descargas
Referencias bibliográficas
Albert, David & Loewer, Barry. “Wanted dead or alive: two attempts to solve
Schrödinger’s paradox”, Proceedings of the Philosophy of Science Association
(1990): 277-285.
Álvarez-Galindo, Gabriel & García-Alcaine, Guillermo. “Localidad einsteiniana
y mecánica cuántica”. Revista Española de Física 19.1 (2005): 43-50.
Aspect, Alain; Dalibar, Jean & Roger, Gerard. “Experimental tests of Bell`s
inequalities using time-varying analyzers”. Physiscal Revew Letters 49 (1982):
-1087.
Bahns, Dorothea; Doplicher, Sergio; Fredenhagen, Klaus & Piacitelli,
Gherardo. “Ultraviolet Finite Quantum Field Theory on Quantum Spacetime”.
Commun. Math. Phys. 237.1-2 (2003): 221-241.
Bell, John S. Lo decible y lo indecible en mecánica cuántica. Madrid: Alianza,
Bene, Gyula. & Dieks, Dennis. “A perspectival version of the modal interpretation
of quantum mechanics and the origin of macroscopic behavior”,
Foundations of Physics 32 (2002): 645-671.
Berkovitz, Joseph & Hemmo, Meir. “Can modal interpretations of quantum
mechanics be reconciled with relativity?”. Philosophy of Science 72 (2005):
-801.
Birkhoff, Garrett & Von Neumann, John. “The Logic of Quantum
Mechanics”. Annals of Mathematics 37 (1936): 823-843.
Bohm, David & Hiley, Basil. The Undivided Universe. An Ontological Interpretation
of Quantum Theory. Londres: Routledge, 1993.
Bub, Jeffrey. Interpreting the Quantum World. Cambridge: Cambridge University
Press, 1997.
Bunge, Mario. Foundations of Physics, New York: Spinger-Verlag, 1967a.
—. Quantum theory and reality. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1967b.
—, ed. Problems in the foundations of physics. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1971.
—. The Furniture of the World. Dordrecht-Boston: Reidel, 1977.
—. Filosofía de la Física. Barcelona: Ariel, 1982.
—. Epistemología. Barcelona: Ariel, 1985.
Busch, Paul. “Can «Unsharp Objectification» Solve the Quantum Measurement
Problem?”. Int. J. Theor. Phys. 37.1 (1998): 241-247.
Busch, Paul; Lahti, Pekka. & Mittelstaedt, Peter. The Quantum Theory of
Measurement. 2ª ed. Berlin: Springer, 1996.
Busch, Paul. & Shimony, Abner. “Insolubility of the quantum measurement
problem for unsharp observables”. Stud. Hist. Phil. Mod. Phys. 27.4 (1996)
-404.
Cabello, Adán; Estebaranz, José M & Garcia, Guillermo. “Bell-Kochen-
Specker theorem: A proof with 18 vectors”. Physics Letters. A 212 (1996):
-187.
Cassinello, Andrés. “La indeterminación en mecánica cuántica”. Revista de la
Real Sociedad Española de Física 21.4 (2007): 42-53.
D’Espagnat, Bernard. On Physics and Philosophy. Princeton: Princeton University
Press, 2006.
Dickson, Michael. “Wavefunction tails in the modal interpretation”. Proceedings
of the Philosophy of Science Association 1 (1994): 366-376.
Doplicher, Sergio; Fredenhagen, Klaus & Roberts, John E. “The quantum
structure of spacetime at the Planck scale and quantum fields”. Commun.
Math. Phys. 172.1 (1995): 187-220.
Einstein, Albert; Podolsky, Boris & Rosen, Nathan. “Can quantum-mechanical
description of reality be considered complete?”. Physical Review 47
(1935): 777-780.
Elby, Andrew. “Why «modal» interpretations of quantum mechanics don’t
solve the measurement problem”. Foundations of Physics Letters 6 (1993):
-19.
Fock, Vladimir A. “Remarks on Bohr’s article on his discussions with
Einstein”. Usp. Fiz. Nauk, 66 (1958): 599-607.
Gleason, Andrew M. “Measures on the Closed Subspaces of a Hilbert Space”.
Journal of Mathematics and Mechanics 6 (1957): 885-893.
Gottfried, Kurt. “Does Quantum Mechanics Carry the Seeds of its own
Destruction?” Quantum Reflections. Eds. D. Amati D, J. Ellis. Cambridge:
Cambridge University Press, 2000. 165-185.
Halvorson, Hans & Clifton, Rob. “No Place for Particles in Relativistic
Quantum Theory?”. Philosophy of Science 69 (2002): 1-28.
Heisenberg, Werner. Physics and Philosophy. New York: Harper & Row, 1958.
Hiley, Basil J. “Foundations of Quantum Mechanics”. Contemporary Physics
(1977): 411-414.
Jammer, Max. The Philosophy of Quantum Mechanics: The Interpretations of
Quantum Mechanics. An Historical Perspective. New York: John Wiley &
Sons, 1974.
—. The Conceptual Development of Quantum Mechanics. New York: McGraw-
Hill, 1996.
Jauch, Josef M & Piron, Constantin. “Can Hidden variables be Excluded in
Quantum Mechanics?”. Helvetica Physica Acta 36 (1963): 827-837.
Kochen, Simon & Specker, Ernst. “The Problem of Hidden Variables in
Quantum Mechanics”. Journal of Mathematics and Mechanics 17 (1967):
-87.
Mackey, George. The Mathematical Foundations of Quantum Mechanics. New
York: Benjamin, 1963.
Mittelstaedt, Peter. Philosophical Problems of Modern Physics. Dordrecht:
Reidel, 1975.
—. “The Constitution of Objects in Kant’s Philosophy and in Modern
Physics”. Kant and Contemporary Epistemology. Ed. P. Parrini. Dordrecht:
Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1994. 169-181.
—. The Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics and the Measurement Process.
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998.
Musgrave, Alan. “Discussion: Realism About What?”. Philosophy of Science 59
(1992): 691-697.
Omelyanovskij, Mykhailo E; Tagliagambe, Silvano & Geymonat, Ludovico.
L’ interpretazione Materialistica della Mecánica Quantistica. Milán: Feltrineli,
Popper, Karl. “The Propensity Interpretation of Probability”, British Journal
for the Philosophy of Science, 10 (1959): 25-42.
Pusey, Matthew; Barrett, Jonathan & Rudolph, Terry. “The quantum state
cannot be interpreted statistically”. Quantum Physics (2011). En línea.
<http://xxx.lanl.gov/abs/1111.3328v1>.
Rescher N. Scientific Realism. A Critical Reappraisal. Dordrecht: Reidel, 1987.
Schroedinger, Erwin. “Die gegenwärtige Situation in der Quantenmechanik”,
Naturwissenschaften 23 (1935): 807-812; 823-838; 844-849.
Stapp, Henry P. “S-Matrix Interpretation of Quantum Theory”, Physical
Review D 3 (1971): 1303-1320.
Van Fraassen, Bas. “The Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen paradox”, Synthese 29
(1974) 291-309.
—. Quantum Mechanics. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1991.
Von Neumann, John. Mathematische Grundlagen der Quantenmechanik.
Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 1932.
Wheeler, John A & Zurek, Wojciech H., eds. Quantum Theory and Measurement.
Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1983.
