Hacia una mejor comprensión de la decoherencia desde una perspectiva general
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18270/rcfc.v12i24.1695Resumen
El trabajo se propone presentar un enfoque de la decoherencia cuántica más general
que el enfoque tradicional de la decoherencia inducida por el entorno (environmentinduced
decoherence) formulado por Zurek y sus colaboradores. Este nuevo enfoque,
que viene desarrollándose en diversas publicaciones de nuestro grupo, adopta la perspectiva
del sistema cerrado completo, sistema más entorno, y se basa en el análisis
de la evolución temporal de los valores medios de los observables de dicho sistema
cerrado. Al unificar la decoherencia inducida por el entorno y algunas propuestas
alternativos, este nuevo enfoque facilitaría la elucidación del concepto de decoherencia
desde una perspectiva general.
Descargas
Referencias bibliográficas
Adler, S. “Why decoherence has not solved the measurement problem: a
response to P. W. Anderson”. Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern
Physics, 34 (2003): 135-142.
—. Quantum Theory as an Emergent Phenomenon. Cambridge: Cambridge
University Press, 2004.
Bacciagaluppi, G & Hemmo, M.. “Making sense of approximate decoherence”.
Proceedings of the Philosophy of Science Association, 1 (1994): 345-354.
—. “Modal interpretations, decoherence and measurements”. Studies in
History and Philosophy of Modern Physics, 27 (1996): 239-277.
Bonifacio, R., Olivares, S., Tombesi, P. & Vitali, D. “Model-independent
approach to nondissipative decoherence”. Physical Review A, 61 (2000):
Bub, J. Interpreting the Quantum World. Cambridge: Cambridge University
Press, 1997.
Casati, G. & Chirikov, B. “Quantum chaos: unexpected complexity”. Physica
D, 86 (1995): 220-237.
Casati, G. & Prosen, T. “Quantum chaos and the double-slit experiment”.
Physical Review A, 72 (2005): 032111.
Castagnino, M. & Fortin, S. “Predicting decoherence in discrete models”.
International Journal of Theoretical Physics, 50 (2011): 2259-2267.
Castagnino, M., Fortin, S., Laura, R. & Lombardi, O. “A general theoretical
framework for decoherence in open and closed systems”. Classical and
Quantum Gravity, 25 (2008): 154002.
Castagnino M. & Lombardi, O. “The self-induced approach to decoherence
in cosmology”. International Journal of Theoretical Physics, 42 (2003): 1281-
—. “Self-induced decoherence: a new approach”. Studies In History and Philosophy
of Science Part B: Studies In History and Philosophy of Modern Physics,
(2004): 73-107.
—. “Self-induced decoherence and the classical limit of quantum mechanics”.
Philosophy of Science, 72 (2005a): 764-776.
—. “Decoherence time in self-induced decoherence”. Physical Review A, 72
(2005b): 764-776.
Diosi, L. “A universal master equation for the gravitational violation of
quantum mechanics”. Physics Letters A, 120 (1987): 377-381.
Elby, A. “The «decoherence» approach to the measurement problem in
quantum mechanics”. Proceedings of the 1994 Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy
of Science Association, Vol. 1. East Lansing: Philosophy of Science
Association, 1994.
Ford, G. W. & O’Connell, R. F. “Decoherence without dissipation”. Physics
Letters A, 286 (2001): 87-90.
Frasca, M. “General theorems on decoherence in the thermodynamic limit”.
Physics Letters A, 308 (2003): 135-139.
Gambini, R. & Pulin, J. “Relational physics with real rods and clocks and the
measurement problem of quantum mechanics”. Foundations of Physics, 37
(2007): 1074-1092.
Healey, R. “Dissipating the quantum measurement problem”. Topoi, 14
(1995): 55-65.
Heisenberg, W. “Über den anschaulichen Inhalt der quantentheoretischer
Kinematic und Mechanik”. Zeitschrift für Physik, 43 (1927): 172-198.
Versión inglesa: “The physical content of quantum kinematics and mechanics”.
Quantum Theory and Measurement. Eds. J. A. Wheeler & W. H.
Zurek. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1983.
Joos, E. “Elements of environmental decoherence”. Decoherence: Theoretical,
Experimental, and Conceptual Problems. Eds. P. Blanchard, D. Giulini, E.
Joos, C. Kiefer & I.-O. Stamatescu. Heidelberg-Berlin: Springer, 2000.
Lecture Notes in Physics 538.
Kiefer, C. & Polarski, D. “Why do cosmological perturbations look classical
to us?”. Advanced Science Letters, 2 (2009): 164-173.
Leggett, A. J. “Reflections on the quantum measurement paradox”. Quantum
Implications. Eds. B. J. Hiley & F. D. Peat. Londres: Routledge and Kegan
Paul, 1987.
Lombardi, O. & Vanni, L. “Medición cuántica y decoherencia: ¿qué medimos
cuando medimos?”. Scientiae Studia, 8 (2010): 273-291.
Milburn, G. J. “Intrinsic decoherence in quantum mechanics”. Physical
Review A, 44 (1991): 5401-5406.
Paz, J. P. & Zurek, W. H. “Environment-induced decoherence and the transition
from quantum to classical”. Fundamentals of Quantum Information:
Quantum Computation, Communication, Decoherence and All That. Ed. D.
Heiss. Heidelberg-Berlin: Springer, 2002.
Penrose, R. Shadows of the Mind. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1995.
Pessoa Jr., O. “Can the decoherence approach help to solve the measurement
problem?”, Synthese, 113 (1998): 323-346.
Schlosshauer, M. “Decoherence, the measurement problem, and interpretations
of quantum mechanics”, Reviews of Modern Physics, 76 (2004):
-1305.
—. Decoherence and the Quantum-to-Classical Transition. Berlin-Heidelberg:
Springer, 2007.
Sicardi, A. C., Abal, G., Siri, R., Romanelli, A. & Donangelo, R. “Intrinsic
decoherence and irreversibility in a quasiperiodic kicked rotor”, arXiv:quantph/
, 2003.
Von Neumann, J. Mathematical Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Trad. R.
T. Beyer. Princeton: Princeton University Press, [1932] 1996.
Zeh, D. “On the interpretation of measurement in quantum theory”, Foundations
of Physics, 1 (1970): 69-76.
Zurek, W. H. “Pointer basis of quantum apparatus: into what mixture does
the wave packet collapse?”, Physical Review D, 24 (1981): 1516-1525.
—. “Environment-induced superselection rules”, Physical Review D, 26 (1982):
-1880.
—. “Decoherence and the transition from quantum to classical”, Physics Today,
(1991): 36-44.
—. “Preferred sets of states, predictability, classicality and environment-induced
decoherence”. Physical Origins of Time Asymmetry. Eds. J. J. Halliwell, J.
Pérez-Mercader & W. H. Zurek, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press,
—. “Decoherence, einselection, and the quantum origins of the classical”.
Reviews of Modern Physics, 75 (2003): 715-776.
