Integration of Analogies in Scientific Modeling

Authors

  • Natalia Carrillo-Escalera Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (UNAM). Estudiante de doctorado en Filosofía de la Ciencia. Este trabajo se ha realizado dentro del proyecto PAPIIT de la UNAM con clave IN402018 titulado "Cognición, artefactualidad y representación en la ciencia."

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18270/rcfc.v18i37.2580

Keywords:

Modeling, Scientific Representation, Analogy, Nervous Impulse, Hodgkin And Huxley Model

Abstract

Discussion of modeling within philosophy of science has focused in how models, understood as finished products, represent the world. This approach has some issues accounting for the value of modeling in situations where there are controversies as to which should be the object of representation. In this work I show that a historical analysis of modeling complements the aforementioned representational program, since it allows us to examine processes of integration of analogies that play a role in the generation of criteria of relevance, which are important for the configuration of the object of research. This, in turn, shows that there are norms in modeling practices whose historical reconstruction is relevant for their philosophical analysis.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Natalia Carrillo-Escalera, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (UNAM). Estudiante de doctorado en Filosofía de la Ciencia. Este trabajo se ha realizado dentro del proyecto PAPIIT de la UNAM con clave IN402018 titulado "Cognición, artefactualidad y representación en la ciencia."

She studied mathematics at the UNAM and did master's studies at the same institution in the area of philosophy of cognitive science. He is currently finishing his PhD in Philosophy of Science at UNAM, where he investigated the philosophical dimensions of the contemporary debate between the Hodgkin model and Huxley, the Heimburg and Jackson model of nervous impulse. His work focuses on the role of models in advancing scientific understanding. In particular, he has been interested in the role of abstraction in scientific modeling.

References

B. C. Abbott, A. V. Hill, y J. V. Howarth. “The Positive and Negative Heat Production Associated with a Nerve Impulse.” Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 148.931 (1958): 149–87. <https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.1958.0012>.

Cole, Kenneth, S. “Rectification and Inductance in the Squid Gian Axon”. The Journal of General Physiology 25.1 (1941): 29–51. <10.1085/jgp.25.1.29 >.

Gelfert, Axel. How to Do Science with Models. Springer, 2016. <https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-27954-1>.

Godfrey-Smith, Peter. “Abstractions, Idealizations, and Evolutionary Biology”. Mapping the Future of Biology. Springer Netherlands, 2018. 47–56.

Hille, Bertil. Ionic Channels of Excitable Membranes. Second Edition. Sinauer Associates, 1992.

Hodgkin, A. L. “The Croonian Lecture: Ionic Movements and Electrical Activity in Giant Nerve Fibres”. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 148.930 (1958): 1–37.

Hodgkin, A. L. The Conduction of the Nervous Impulse. The Sherrington Lectures, Charles C Thomas, 1964.

Hodgkin, A. L., y Andrew F. Huxley. “The Components of Membrane Conductance in the Giant Axon of Loligo A”. The Journal of Physiology 116.4 (1952a): 473–96.

______. “A Quantitative Description of Membrane Current and Its Application to Conduction and Excitation in Nerve”. The Journal of Physiology 117.4 (1952b): 500–44.

Knuuttila, Tarja. “Modelling and Representing: An Artefactual Approach to Model-Based Representation”. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 42.2 (2011): 262–71.

Levy, Arnon. “Idealization and Abstraction: Refining the Distinction”. Synthese 1.1 (2018): 1–18.

Lillie, Ralph S. “The Passive Iron Wire Model of Protoplasmic and Nervous Transmission and its Physiological Analogues”. Biological Reviews 11.2 (1936): 181–209.

Meares, Patrick. “Flux Coupling and Nonlinear Membrane Phenomena”. Structure and Funciton in Excitable Cells. Eds. Chang, Donald C, Ichiji Tasaki, William J. Adelman y H R. Leuchtag. Plenum Press, 1983.

Massimi, Michela. “Perspectival Modeling”. Philosophy of Science 85.3 (2018) 335–359.

Mosgaard, Lars D., Zecchi K.A., Heimburg T. y Budvytyte R. “The Effect of the Nonlinearity of the Response of Lipid Membranes to Voltage Perturbations on the Interpretation of Their Electrical Properties. A New Theoretical Description”. Membranes 5.4 (2015): 495–512.

Peschard, Isabelle. “Target Systems, Phenomena and the Problem of Relevance”. The Modern Schoolman 87.3 (2010): 267.

Sanches de Oliveira, Guilherme. “Approaches to Scientific Modeling, and the (Non) Issue of Representation: A Case Study in Multi-Model Research on Thigmotaxis and Group Thermoregulation”. Model-Based Reasoning in Science and Technology. Eds. Lorenzo Magnani y Claudia Casadio. Springer, 2016. 79–100.

Seyfarth, Ernst-August und Leo Peichl. “Vor 100 Jahren: Julius Bernstein (1839-1917) Formuliert Seine Membrantheorie”. Neuroforum 4.2 (2002): 274–76

Tasaki, Ichiji. Physiology and Electrochemistry Nerve Fibers. Academic Press, 1982.

Tasaki, Ichiji, y Kunihiko Iwasa. “Rapid Pressure Changes and Surface Displacements in the Squid Giant Axon Associated with Production of Action Potentials”. Japanese Journal of Physiology 32.1 (1982): 69–81.

Teorell, Torsten. “Excitability Phenomena in Artificial Membranes”. Biophysical Journal 2.2 (1962): 25–51.

Weisberg, Michael. Simulation and Similarity: Using Models to Understand the World. New York: Oxford University Press, 2013.

Published

2018-12-27

How to Cite

Carrillo-Escalera, N. (2018). Integration of Analogies in Scientific Modeling. Revista Colombiana De Filosofía De La Ciencia, 18(37), 317–335. https://doi.org/10.18270/rcfc.v18i37.2580
Article metrics
Abstract views
Galley vies
PDF Views
HTML views
Other views