Neither Pyrrhonian nor Creationist, Materialist and Revolutionary

Natural Philosophy and Politics in Jean Meslier’s Mémoire

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18270/rcfc.v22i45.4204

Keywords:

pyrrhonism, creationism, materialism, atheism, natural philosophy, political action, revolution

Abstract

Based on a thesis of Margaret Jacob, this article has two aims: on the one hand, it analyses Jean Meslier’s natural philosophy in order to highlight the supremacy of the materialist hypothesis over the creationist; on the other hand, it links his metaphysical position with his proposal for political action in order to show that the popular and revolutionary atheism defended by the priest is compatible with the idea that movement is an essential quality of matter, and not an effect of God’s will.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Anónimo clandestino (siglos XVII-XVIII). “La vida y el espíritu del señor Benedicto de Spinoza o Tratado de los tres impostores (Moisés, Jesucristo y Mahoma)”. Estudio preliminar, edición, notas y traducción de Pedro Lomba. Madrid: Tecnos, 2009.

Benítez, Miguel. “Luces y elitismo en los manuscritos clandestinos”. La cara oculta de las Luces (investigaciones sobre los manuscritos filosóficos clandestinos de los siglos XVII y XVIII), Biblioteca Valenciana, 2003a, pp. 247-259.

______. “La duda como método. Escepticismo y materialismo en la literatura clandestina del siglo XVIII en Francia”. La cara oculta de las Luces (investigaciones sobre los manuscritos filosóficos clandestinos de los siglos XVII y XVIII), Biblioteca Valenciana, 2003b, pp. 349-382.

______. Les yeux de la raison. Le matérialisme athée de Jean Meslier. París, Honoré Champion, 2012.

Charles, Sébastien. “Ceticismo e clandestididade”. Sképsis, vol. II, n.º 3-4, 2008, 95-108.

______. “Skepticism and solipsism in the eighteenth century: Revisiting the egoist question”. Skepticism in the Modern Age. Building on the work of Richard Popkin, editado por José R. Maia Neto, Gianni Paganini y John C. Laursen, Leiden, Brill, 2009, pp. 325-341.

______. “Fiction philosophique et fiction littéraire au siècle des Lumières: le cas de la secte égoïste”. Passages par la fiction. Expériences de pensée et autres dispositifs fictionnels de Descartes à Madame de Staël, editado por Bertrand Binoche y Daniel Dumouchel, París, Herman, 2013, pp. 75-93.

D’Holbach, Paul Henri. Le Bon-Sens ou Idées naturelles oposées aux Idées surnaturelles. À Londres [Amsterdam: chez Marc-Michel Rey], 1772.

De la Boétie, Étienne. Discurso de la servidumbre voluntaria. Las Cuarenta Editorial, 2010.

De Lima Piva, Paulo Jonas. Ateísmo e revolta. Os manuscritos do padre Jean Meslier. São Paulo, Alameda, 2006.

De Montaigne, Michel. Essais. París, Éditions Galimard, 1965 [1580].

Descartes, René. Méditations métaphysiques. París, Editions Flammarion, 1992 [1641].

Devellennes, Charles. Positive atheism. Bayle, Meslier, D’Holbach, Diderot. Edinburgh University Press, 2021.

Diógenes Laercio. Vidas de los filósofos ilustres. Madrid, Alianza, 2007.

Dommanget, Maurice. Le curé Meslier. Athée, communiste & révolutionnaire sous Louis XIV. Éditions Coda, 2008 [1965].

Fénelon, François de Salignac de La Mothe. Oeuvres philosophiques. Démonstration de l’existence de Dieu. París, Florentine Delaune, 1718.

Hazard, Paul. La crisis de la conciencia europea (1680-1715). Madrid, Alianza Editorial, 1988.

Israel, Jonathan. Radical enlightenment. Philosophy and making of Modernity, 1650-1750. Oxford University Press, 2001.

______. Enlightenment contested. Philosophy, Modernity, and the emancipation of man, 1670-1752. Oxford University Press, 2006.

______. Democratic enlightenment. Philosophy, revolution, and human rights, 1750-1790. Oxford University Press, 2011.

______. The enlightenment that failed. Ideas, revolution, and democratic defeat, 1748-1830. Oxford University Press, 2020.

Jacob, Margaret. The radical enlightenment. Pantheists, Freemasons and Republicans, Londres, George Allen & Unwin, 1981.

______. “The radical enlightenment and freemasonry: Where we are now”. Philosophica, vol. 88, 2013a, pp. 13-29.

______. “The populist voice of the early enlightenment”. In praise of ordinary people. Early modern Britain and Dutch Republic, editado por Margaret Jacob y Catherine Secretan, Nueva York, Palgrave Macmillan, 2013b, pp. 163-180.

Jacob, Margaret y Catherine Secretan, editoras. In praise of ordinary people. Early Modern Britain and Dutch Republic. Nueva York, Palgrave Macmillan, 2013.

Lanson, Gustave. “Questions diverses sur l’histoire de l’esprit philosophique en France avant 1750”. Revue d’Histoire Littéraire de la France, vol. 19, n.º 1, 1912, pp. 1-29.

Meslier, Jean. Œuvres complètes. T. I. París, Antrophos, 1970.

______. Œuvres complètes. T. II. París, Antrophos, 1971.

______. Œuvres complètes. T. III París, Antrophos, 1972.

Mondot, Jean., y Révauger, Cécile (coord.) “Dossier: Lumières radicales - Radicalisme des Lumières”. Lumières vol. 13, 2009, pp. 7-185.

Mori, Gianluca. Early modern atheism from Spinoza to d’Holbach. Liverpool University Press, 2021.

Mori, Gianluca y Alain Mothu, editores. Philosophes sans Dieu. Textes athées clandestins du XVIIIe siècle. Champion, 2010.

Sextus Empiricus. Esquisses pyrrhoniennes. París, Éditions du Seuil, 1997.

Toland, John. Letters to Serena. Londres, Bernard Lintot, 1704.

Wade, Ira. The clandestine organisation and diffusion of philosophic ideas in France from 1700 to 1750. Princeton University Press, 1938.

Published

2022-12-21

How to Cite

Tizziani, M. (2022). Neither Pyrrhonian nor Creationist, Materialist and Revolutionary: Natural Philosophy and Politics in Jean Meslier’s Mémoire. Revista Colombiana De Filosofía De La Ciencia, 22(45). https://doi.org/10.18270/rcfc.v22i45.4204
Crossref Cited-by logo
Article metrics
Abstract views
Galley vies
PDF Views
HTML views
Other views