Physical Entities and Spatiotemporal Junk.

A Critical Reconstruction of P. Dowe's Physical Ontology

Authors

  • Wilfredo Quezada Pulido Departamento de Filosofía Universidad de Santiago de Chile
  • Luis Pavez Departamento de Filosofía Universidad de Santiago de Chile https://orcid.org/0009-0000-8478-8277

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18270/rcfc.4303

Keywords:

physical causation, conserved quantities, mark transmission, causal processes, pseudoprocesses, timewisegerrymander, spacewisegerrymander

Abstract

A classic challenge for any theory of physical causation based on conserved quantities and formulated within the framework of special relativity theory, has been to distinguish two regions, that of genuine causal relationships and that of those spurious or noncausal ones. In the causal processes theory defended by P. Dowe, this is done by introducing a criterion based on the possession of a conserved quantity, which would seem to efficiently demarcate between causal processes and causal pseudoprocesses. However, faced with criticism about the inadequacy of his criteria, Dowe has proposed modifying his physical ontology and introducing, along with processes and pseudo-processes, two types of physical gerrymander entities, both temporal and spatial. In this article, we analyze and criticize, from the perspective of ERT, Dowe’s characterization of these quasi-entities and the theoretical need to make a clear-cut distinction between them. This implies a fundamental modification of Dowe's ontology and raises other doubts about its original motivation.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Choi, Sungho. “Causation and Gerrymandered World Lines: A Critique of Salmon”. Philosophy of Science 69.1 (2002): 105-117. <https://doi.org/10.1086/338943>

Dowe, Phil. “Causality and Conserved Quantities: A Reply to Salmon”. Philosophy of Science 62.2 (1995a): 321-333. <https://doi.org/10.1086/289859>

______. “What’s Right and What’s Wrong with Transference Theories”. Erkenntnis 42.1 (1995b): 363-374. <https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01129010>

______. Physical Causation. Cambridge University Press, 2000. <https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511570650>

Earman, John. “No Superluminal Propagation for Classical Relativistic and Relativistic Quantum Fields”. Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 48 (2014): 102-108. <http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsb.2014.07.005>

Hitchcock, Christopher. “Causal Processes and Interactions: What are They and What Are They Good for?”. Philosophy of Science 71 (2004): 932-941. <https://doi.org/10.1086/425236>

Kistler, Max. “Reducing Causality to Transmission”. Erkenntnis 48 (1998): 1-24. <https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005374229251>

Kistler, Max. Causalité et lois de la nature. París: Librarie Philosophique J. Vrin, 1999.

Quezada, Wilfredo y Pavez, Luis. “Causalidad, pseudocausalidad y medición”. Revista de Filosofía U. de Chile 67 (2011): 251-268. <https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-43602011000100016>

______. Velocidad de fase, velocidad de grupo y velocidad de la luz: una guía (causal) para entender sus relaciones. II Jornada de Fundamentos, Filosofía e Historia de la Física. Universidad de Buenos Aires, Argentina, septiembre 2021. Ponencia.

______. Entidades físicas y basura espaciotemporal. Una reconstrucción crítica de la ontología física de P. Dowe. XXII Jornadas Rolando Chuaqui en Filosofía y Ciencias. Universidad de Valparaíso, Valparaíso, Chile, octubre 2022a. Ponencia.

______. Ontología física: entidades y simuladores de entidades. III Jornada de Fundamentos, Filosofía e Historia de la Física. Universidad de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina, octubre 2022b. Ponencia.

Reichenbach, Hans. The Philosophy of Space and Time. Nueva York: Dover, 1958.

Robb, Alfred. A Theory of Time and Space. Cambridge University Press, 1914.

Salmon, Wesley. “Causality without counterfactuals”. Philosophy of Science 61.2 (1994): 297-312. <https://doi.org/10.1086/289801>

______. “Causality and Explanation: A Reply to Two Critiques”. Philosophy of Science 64.3 (1997): 461-477. <https://doi.org/10.1086/392561>

______. Causality and Explanation. Nueva York: Oxford University Press, 1998. <http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/0195108647.001.0001>

Sklar, Lawrence. Philosophy of Physics. Oxford University Press, 1992. <http://dx.doi.org/10.1201/9780429498305>

Torretti, Roberto. Relativity and Geometry. Oxford: Pergamon Press, 1983.

Published

2024-07-03

How to Cite

Quezada Pulido, W., & Pavez, L. (2024). Physical Entities and Spatiotemporal Junk. : A Critical Reconstruction of P. Dowe’s Physical Ontology. Revista Colombiana De Filosofía De La Ciencia, 24(48). https://doi.org/10.18270/rcfc.4303
Crossref Cited-by logo
Article metrics
Abstract views
Galley vies
PDF Views
HTML views
Other views