De la Filosofía de la Tecnología a la Filosofía de la Ingeniería

Autores/as

  • Orlando López-Cruz Universidad El Bosque

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18270/rcfc.v20i41.3385

Palabras clave:

filosofía de la ingeniería, filosofía de la tecnología, investigación en ingeniería, epistemología de la ingeniería, pensamiento de ingeniería

Resumen

La creencia generalizada, heredada del inicio del siglo xx, dice que la ingeniería es la aplicación del conocimiento científico. Sin embargo, mediante la comprensión de los conceptos de técnica y tecnología, más allá de un asunto lingüístico, aparece la escena la ingeniería con más líneas de trabajo que solo los asuntos éticos que han sido de amplia consideración en la tradición de la filosofía de la ingeniería o incluso en la sociología de la tecnología. Con una detallada disertación sobre la naturaleza del conocimiento en ingeniería y la inspección del proceso para conducir investigación en ingeniería, en contraste con la forma como el método científico genera conocimiento científico, se infiere que además de crear dos diferentes clases de conocimiento humano, la ciencia y la ingeniería requieren de diferentes métodos de investigación, si bien coinciden en algunos puntos.         

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.

Biografía del autor/a

Orlando López-Cruz, Universidad El Bosque

  • Afiliación institucional, cargo y ciudad-país:  Universidad El Bosque, Docente, Bogotá D.C., Colombia

  • Áreas de trabajo y experiencia y una breve descripción del Curriculum: Investigación en Epistemología de la Ingeniería, modelamiento y simulación computacional de Sistemas Complejos, matemáticas y transferencia-transformación de conocimiento organizacional.  Doctor en Ingeniería por la Pontificia Universidad Javeriana, Magister en Administración por la Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Especialista en Sistemas de Control Organizacional por la Universidad de los Andes.  Docente universitario con experiencia laboral en auditoría y control interno.

Referencias bibliográficas

Agassi, Joseph. “The Confusion between Science and Technology in the Standard Philosophies of Science”. Studies in The Structure of Thinking in the Technological Sciences. Ed. Friedrich Rapp. Changchun: Jilin People’s Publishing House, 1988. 51-52.

Aslaksen, Erik W. “Some Thoughts on the Foundation of Systems Engineering”. Incose Forum. Insight, 2007.

____. “The Engineering Paradigm”. International Journal of Engineering Studies 5.2 (2013): 129-154.

Axelrod, Robert. The complexity of cooperation: Agent-based models of competition and collaboration. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1997.

Auyang, Sunny Y. “Knowledge in Science and Engineering”. Synthese 168.3 (2009): 319-331. <https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-008-9453-0>

Banse, Gerhard, and Armin Grunwald. “Coherence and Diversity in the Engineering Sciences”. Philosophy of Technology and Engineering Sciences. Ed. Anthonie Meijers. The Netherlands: Springer, 2009.

Baumberg, Jeremy J. The Secret Life of Science How It Really Works and Why It Matters. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press, 2018.

Beakley, George C., Donovan L. Evans, and John Bert Keats. Engineering: an Introduction to a Creative Profession. New York: Macmillan Publishing Company, 1986.

Bertalanffy, Ludwig von. General Systems Theory, Foundations, Development, Applications. New York: Braziller, 1969.

Black, Max. “Are There Any Philosophically Interesting Questions in Technology?” PSA: Proceedings of The Biennial Meeting of The Philosophy of Technology Association (1976): 185-193.

Bonabeau, Eric. “Agent-based modeling: Methods and techniques for simulating human systems”. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 99. 3 (2002): 7280-7287.

Boon, Mieke. “In Defense of Engineering Sciences: On the Epistemological Relations between Science and Technology”. Techné 15.1 (2011): 49-71.

Bucciarelli, Louis L. Engineering Philosophy. Delft: Delft University Press, 2003.

Bunge, Mario. “The Philosophical Richness of Technology”. PSA: The Philosophy of Technology Association 2.1 (1976): 153-172. <https://doi.org/10.1086/psaprocbienmeetp.1976.2.192379>

Burke, John G. Technology and Change, 1919. New York: San Francisco, 1979.

Bush, Vannevar. “Science the Endless Frontier: A Report to the President by Vannevar Bush, Director of the Office of Scientific Research and Development, July 1945”. 1945. <https://www.nsf.gov/od/lpa/nsf50/vbush1945.htm>

Channell, David F. “The Emergence of the Engineering Sciences: an Historical Analysis”. Philosophy of Technology and Engineering Sciences. Ed. Anthonie Meijers. The Netherlands: Elsevier, 2009. 117-154.

Dessauer, Friedrich. Discusión sobre la técnica. 1956. Madrid: Ediciones Rialp, S.A., 1964.

Dewey, John. Art as Experience. Penguin, 2005.

Drexler, K. Eric. Radical Abundance: How a Revolution in Nanotechnology Will Change Civilization. New York: BBS PublicAffairs, 2013.

Eekels, Johannes, and Norbert F. Roozenburg. “A Methodological Comparison of the Structures of Scientific Research and Engineering Design: Their Similarities and Differences”. Design Studies 12.4 (1991): 197-203.

El-Zein, Abbas H., & Hedemenn, Chris. “Beyond Problem Solving: Engineering and the Public Good in the 21st Century”. Journal of Cleaner Production 137.1 (2016): 692-700.

Ellul, Jacques. The Technological System. Trans. Joachim Eugene. Oregon: Wipf and Stock Publishers, 2018.

Espinas, Alfred Victor. “Les Origines de la Technologie”. Revue Philosophique de La France et de L'étrange (1897).

Garcia-Diaz, Cesar, & Olaya, Camilo Enrique. Social systems engineering: the design of complexity. Hoboken, N.J.: John Wiley & Sons, 2017.

Gibson, James J. “The Theory of Affordances”. Perceiving, Acting, and Knowing. Toward an Ecological Psychology. Eds. R. Shaw & B. J. Hillsdale: NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1977. 67-82.

______. The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception. Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1979.

Giere, Ronald. “A Dilemma for Philosophers of Science and Technology”. PSA: Proceedings of The Biennial Meeting of The Philosophy of Science Association (1976): 194-201. <https://doi.org/10.1086/psaprocbienmeetp.1976.2.192382>

Goldberg, David E. “Why Philosophy? Why Now? Engineering Responds to the Crisis of a Creative Era”. Philosophy and Engineering: an Emerging Agenda. Eds. Ibo van de Poel, and David E. Goldberg. Dordrecht: Springer, 2009. 255-263.

____. “Is Engineering Philosophically Weak?” Philosophy and Engineering: Reflections on Practice, Principles and Process (2013): 391-405. <https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7762-0_30>

Goldman, Steven L. “Philosophy, Engineering, and Western Culture”. Broad and Narrow Interpretations of Philosophy of Technology. Dordrecht: Springer, 1990. 125-152.

_____. “Why We Need a Philosophy of Engineering: a Work in Progress”. Interdisciplinary Science Reviews 29.2 (2004): 163-176. <https://doi.org/10.1179/030801804225012572>

Greber, Henry. “The Philosophy of Engineering”. IEEE Spectrum 3.10 (1966): 112-115.

Grimson, William. And Mike, Murphy. “Making the Case for the Inclusion of Lay Persons on Engineering Accreditation Panels: a Role for an Engineering Hippocratic Oath?”. Philosophy and Engineering: Reflections on Practice, Principles, and Process. Eds. D. Michelfelder, N. McCarthy, and D. Goldberg. Dordrecht: Springer, 2013.

Grundmann, Reiner. “The Problem of Expertise in Knowledge Societies”. Minerva 55.1 (2017): 25-48. <https://doi.org/10.1007/s11024-016-9308-7>

Habermas, Jürgen. Ciencia y técnica como “ideología”. Trans. Manuel Jiménez Redondo, and Manuel Garrido. 4th ed. Madrid: Tecnos, 1984.

Heidegger, Martin. The Question Concerning Technology and Other Essays. New York: Harper & Row, 1977.

Heywood, John. “Philosophy and Engineering Education. A Review of Certain Developments in the Field”. 38th ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference. New York: Saratoga Springs, 2008.

Hocking, William Ernest. “Dewey's Concepts of Experience and Nature”. The Philosophical Review 49.2 (1940): 228-244. <https://doi.org/10.2307/2180801>

Hooykaas, Reijer. “The Rise of Modern Science: When and Why?” The British Journal for the History of Science 20.4 (1987): 453-473.

Jaramillo Patiño, Diego Fernando. “¿Existe una filosofía de la ingeniería?” Universitas Philosophica 64 (2015): 313-328. <http://hdl.handle.net/10554/31891>

Kapp, Ernst. “Grundlinien Einer Philosophie Der Technik: Zur Entstehungsgeschichte Der Kultur Aus Neuen, 1877”. Philosophische Bibliotek: Meiner Felix Verlag Gmbh, 2015. <http://echo.mpiwg-berlin.mpg.de/MPIWG:2RAZF8X1>

Keys, L. Ken. “Systems Engineering and Technology Management Education for the 21st. Century”. Picmet'09-2009 Portland International Conference on Management of Engineering & Technology. IEEE, 2009.

Koen, Billy Vaughn. “Debunking Contemporary Myths Concerning Engineering”. Philosophy and Engineering: Reflections on Practice, Principles and Process. Dordrecht: Springer, 2013. 115-137.

Latour, Bruno. “Technology is Society Made Durable”. The Sociological Review 38.1 (1990): 103-131.

_______. “On Actor-network Theory. A few Clarifications, Plus More Than A Few Complications”. Philosophical Literary Journal Logos 27.1 (2017): 173-197.

Li, Bocong. “The Triad of Science, Technology and Engineering”. Chinese Philosophy of Technology. Singapore: Springer, 2020. 65-90.

López-Cruz, Orlando. “Taylor el ingeniero que determinó la administración: taylorismo como máxima expresión del cartesianismo en la administración”. Journal of Technology 1.1 (2002): 56-59.

_____. “Trabajador, trabajo y sociedad: una relación que se complejiza en la interacción”. Journal of Technology 5.2 (2006): 59-77. <https://www.academia.edu/19966222/Trabajador_trabajo_y_sociedad_Una_relaci%C3%B3n_que_se_complejiza_en_la_interacci%C3%B3n>

_____. “Engineering Organizational Absorptive Capacity for Effective Knowledge Transfer”. International Conference on Software Process Improvement. Eds. Alvaro Rocha, Jezreel Mejia and Mirna Muñoz. Springer, 2017a.

_____. “Las pretensiones cientificistas de los ingenieros: un estudio a la epistemología de la ingeniería”. Revista Hojas del Bosque 3.5 (2017b): 52-59. <https://doi.org/10.18270/heb.v3i5.2703>

Lorenz, Walter. “Reaching the Person—Social Work Research as Professional Responsibility”. European Journal of Social Work 19.3-4 (2016): 455-467.

Mauss, Marcel. “Les Techniques et La Technologie”. Revue Du Mauss 1 (2004): 434-450.

McCarthy, Natasha. “What Use is Philosophy of Engineering”. Interdisciplinary Science Reviews 32.4 (2007): 320-325.

_____. “The Wisdom of Engineers”. The Philosophers' Magazine 41 (2008): 38-43.

_____. “A World of Things Not Facts”. Philosophy and Engineering. Dordrecht: Springer, 2009. 265-273.

_____. Engineering a Beginner's Guide. Oxford, England: Oneworld Publications, 2011.

Medina, Manuel. “Tecnología y filosofía: más allá de los prejuicios epistemológicos y humanistas”. Isegoría 12 (1995): 180-197.

Mitcham, Carl. ¿Qué es filosofía de la tecnología? Trans. César Cuello Nieto and Roberto Méndez. Barcelona: Anthropos-Universidad Del País Vasco, 1989.

_____. “Dasein versus Design: The Problematics of Turning Making into Thinking”. International Journal of Technology and Design Education 11.1 (2001): 27-36.

_____. “A Philosophical Inadequacy of Engineering”. The Monist 92.3 (2009): 339-356.

_____. “Ethics Is Not Enough: From Professionalism to the Political Philosophy of Engineering”. Contemporary Ethical Issues in Engineering. Ed. Satya Sundar Sethy. Igi Global, 2015. 48-80.

Mitcham, Carl, Peter Kroes, and Anthonie Meijers. The Empirical Turn in the Philosophy of Technology. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2000.

Mitcham, Carl, and Eric Schatzberg. “Defining Technology and the Engineering Sciences”. Philosophy of Technology and Engineering Sciences. Ed. Anthonie Meijers. The Netherlands: Springer, 2009.

Mumford, Lewis. Techniques and Civilization. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1963.

Newberry, Byron. “Engineered Artifacts”. Philosophy and Engineering: Reflections on Practice, Principles and Process. Dordrecht: Springer, 2013. 165-176.

Nonaka, Ikujirō, and Hirotaka Takeuchi. The Knowledge-Creating Company: How Japanese Companies Create the Dynamics of Innovation? New York: Oxford University Press, Inc., 1995.

_____. “The Knowledge-Creating Company”. Harvard Business Review 85.7-8 (2007): 162.

Olaya, Camilo Enrique. “The Importance of Being Atheoretical: Management as Engineering”. Systemic Management for Intelligent Organizations. Berlin: Springer, 2012. 21-46.

_____. “Más ingeniería y menos ciencia por favor”. XI Congreso Latinoamericano de Dinámica de Sistemas. Instituto Tecnológico y de Estudios Superiores de Monterrey, 2013.

Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development [OECD]. Oslo Manual, Guidelines for Collecting and Interpreting Innovation Data. 4th Ed. The Measurement of Scientific, Technological and Innovation Activities. Ed. Eurostat, OECD -. Paris/Eurostat Luxembourg: OECD European Communities - Eurostat, 2018.

Ortega y Gasset, José. Meditación de la técnica. Vicisitudes en las ciencias. Bronca en la fìsica. Espasa-Calpe S.A., 1965.

Parente, Diego. “Los artefactos en cuanto posibilitadores de acción. Problemas en torno a la noción de agencia material en el debate contemporáneo”. Revista Colombiana de Filosofía de la Ciencia 16.33 (2016): 139-168. <https://doi.org/10.18270/rcfc.v16i33.1937>

Petroski, Henry. To Engineer Is Human: The Role of Failure in Successful Design. New York: St. Martins Press, 1982.

_____. The Essential Engineer Why Science Alone Will Not Solve Our Global Problems. New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 2010.

Pirtle, Zachary. “How the Models of Engineering Tell the Truth”. Philosophy and Engineering an Emerging Agenda. Springer, 2010. 95-108.

Pitt, Joseph C. “Philosophy, Engineering, and the Sciences”. Philosophy and Engineering an Emerging Agenda. Eds. Ibo van de Poel, and David E. Goldberg: Dordrecht: Springer, 2010.

_____.“Fitting Engineering into Philosophy”. Philosophy and Engineering: Reflections on Practice, Principles and Process. Dordrecht: Springer, 2013.

Poel, Ibo van de. “Philosophy and Engineering: Setting the Stage”. Philosophy and Engineering an Emerging Agenda. Eds. Ibo van de Poel, and David E. Goldberg. Dordrecht: Springer Science, 2010. 1-13.

Poel, Ibo van de, and David E. Goldberg, Eds. “Philosophy and Engineering: an Emerging Agenda”. Philosophy of Engineering and Technology 1. Vol. 2. Netherlands: Springer Netherlands, 2010.

Pollock, Meagan Ross. “What Is Engineering?” History and Philosophy of Engineering Education, 2009. <http://meaganross.com>

Poser, Hans. “On Structural Differences between Science and Engineering”. Techné: Research in Philosophy and Technology 4.2 (1998): 128-135.

_____. “The Ignorance of Engineers and How They Know It”. Philosophy and Engineering: Reflections on Practice, Principles and Process. Springer, 2013. 3-14.

Project Management Institute [PMI]. A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge. Newtown Square, Pennsylvania: Project Management Institute Inc., 2013.

Santandreu Niell, Margarita. “El concepto de técnica en Ortega y Gasset”. Taula: Quaderns De Pensament (1992): 157-162.

Schmidt, Jon Alan. “Engineering as Willing”. Philosophy and Engineering: Reflections on Practice, Principles and Process. Dordrecht: Springer, 2013. 103-111.

Schumpeter, Joseph Alois. The Theory of Economic Development: An Inquiry into Profits, Capital, Credit, Interest, and the Business Cycle, 1934. Cambridge, Massachussetts: Harvard University Press, 1961.

Simon, Herbert Alexander. “Bounded Rationality”. Utility and Probability. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 1990. 15-18.

Staples, Mark. “Critical Rationalism and Engineering: Methodology”. Synthese 192.1 (2015): 337-362.

Swanson, E. Burton. “Technology as Routine Capability”. MIS Quarterly 43.3 (2019): 1007-1024.

Taylor, Frederick Winslow. The Principles of Scientific Management. New York: Harper & Brothers, 1919.

Taylor, Peter J., Michael Hoyler, and David M. Evans. “A Geohistorical Study of ‘the Rise of Modern Science’: Mapping Scientific Practice through Urban Networks, 1500-1900”. Minerva 46 (2008): 391-410.

Veblen, Thornstein. “The Instinct of Workmanship and the Irksomeness of Labor”. The American Journal of Sociology 4.2 (1898): 187-201.

Vessuri, Hebe M. C. “De la transferencia a la creatividad. Los papeles culturales de la ciencia en los países subdesarrollados”. Desafíos y tensiones actuales en ciencia, tecnología y sociedad. Eds. Andoni Ibarra and José A. López Cerezo. Madrid: Biblioteca Nueva-Organización de Estados Iberoamericanos, 2001.

Vincenti, Walter. What Engineers Know and How They Know It. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1990.

Weiss, Gerhard. Multiagent Systems: a Modern Approach to Distributed Artificial Intelligence. Cambridge, Massachussetts: MIT Press, 1999.

Woolridge, Michael. Reasoning About Rational Agents. . Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2000.

______. An Introduction to Multiagent Systems (2nd ed.). West Sussex, United Kingdom: John Wiley & sons, 2009.

Descargas

Publicado

2021-03-02

Cómo citar

López-Cruz, O. . (2021). De la Filosofía de la Tecnología a la Filosofía de la Ingeniería. Revista Colombiana De Filosofía De La Ciencia, 20(41), 63–111. https://doi.org/10.18270/rcfc.v20i41.3385