Reason Naturalized
(An Empirical Justification of Logic)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18270/rcfc.v23i47.4236Keywords:
rationality, logical pluralism, logic, normativity, logic a posterioriAbstract
The question of rationality is approached from the justification of logic, considering the existence of alternative systems. I delimit this topic to the justification of our criteria for rationality, focusing on inferential rationality. In light of this, I suggest a posteriori solution to recognize logical systems as reasonable, given the absence of an infallible notion of rationality. This proposal is pluralistic, acknowledging multiple valid systems, and normative, establishing that not all have the same value: some are more suited for inferences than others.
Downloads
References
Beall, J.C y Restall, Greg. Logical Pluralism. Estados Unidos: Oxford University Press, 2005. <https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199288403.001.0001>
Blair A. Howard., Subrahmanian V.S. “Paraconsistent Logic Programming”. Foundations of Software Technology and Theoretical Computer Science. FSTTCS 1987. Lecture Notes in Computer Science Vol. 287. Eds. Nori Kesav V. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer, 1987. 340-360. <https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-18625-5_59>
Goodman, Nelson. Fact, Fiction and Forecast. Cuarta edición. Massachusetts:Harvard University Press, 1979.
da Costa, Newton C.A. & Abe, J.M. & Subrahmanian, V.S. “Remarks on Annotated Logic”. Zeitschrift fur Mathematische Logik und Grundlagen der Mathematik Vol 37, 1991. 561-570.
da Silva Filho, João Inácio. Métodos de Aplicações da Lógica Paraconsistente Anotada de Anotação com Dois Valores LPA2v com Construção de Algoritmo e Implementação de Circuitos Eletrônicos, Tesis Doctoral. Universidad de San Pablo, San Pablo, Brazil, 1999.
da Silva Filho, João Inácio. “Introdução ao conceito de estado Lógico Paraconsistente ετ”. Seleção Documental: Inteligência Artificial e novas Tecnologias 17.5 (2010): 20-24.
Field, Hartry. “What is the Normative Role of Logic?” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 83.1 (2009a): 251-268. <https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8349.2009.00181.x>
Field, Hartry “Pluralism in Logic”. Review of Symbolic Logic 2.2 (2009b): 342-359. <https://doi.org/10.1017/s1755020309090182>
Field, Hartry. “What is Logical Validity?” Foundations of Logical Consequence. Eds. C. Caret and O. Hjortland. Oxford University Press, 2015. 32-70. <https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198715696.003.0002>
Gómez Gómez, Cristina. “Lógica paraconsistente anotada aplicada a los robots Emmy”. Scribd. Subido a internet por su autora el 30-10-2016. Descargado el 2/11/2023. <https://es.scribd.com/document/329391074/Logica-Paraconsistente-Anotada-en-Los-Robots-Emmy>
Gómez Gómez, Cristina. (2017) “Lógica Paraconsistente Anotada Aplicada a los Robots Emmy”. Scribd. Subido a internet por su autora el 20/X/2017. Descargado el 2/11/2023. <https://es.scribd.com/document/329391074/Logica-Paraconsistente-Anotada-en-Los-Robots-Emmy>
Harman, Gilbert. Change in View: Principles of Reasoning. M.I.T. Press, Cambridge, 1986.
Hjortland, Ole T. “Anti-Exceptionalism About Logic”. Philosophical Studies 174 (2017): 631–658. <https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-016-0701-8>
Kant, Inmanuel. Lógica. Un manual de lecciones Edición original de G. B. Jäsche 1800: Acompañada de una selección de Reflexiones del legado de Kant. Ed. M. J. Vásquez Lobeiras. Madrid: Akal Ediciones, 2000.
Kapsner, Andreas. Logics and Falsifications. A New Perspective on Constructivist Semantics. Studia Logica Library. Trend in Logic Suiza: Springer, 2014.
Martins, Helga G., Lambert-Torres, Germano, Lemke, Ana M., Nascimento, Marcelo C., Torres, Cláudio R. “Emmy-Paraconsistent Autonomous Robot”. Revista Ciéncias Exatas - Universidade de Taubauté Brasil 15.2 (2009): online. <https://www.researchgate.net/publication/293174679_Emmy_-_Paraconsistent_Autonomous_Robot>
MacFarlane, John “In What Sense (if Any) is Logic Normative for Thought?” Central Division APA (2004): 1-24. Inédito. Referido en (Steinberger, 2017a) y en (Steinberger, 2019). <https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:122695239>
MacFarlane, John. Assessment Sensitivity. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014.
Milne, Peter. “What is the Normative Role of Logic?” Proceedings of The Aristotelian Society 83 (2009): 269-298. <https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8349.2009.00182.x>
O Cinneide, Mel. “Cómo Juega AlphaCero al ajedrez?” Versión en español actualizada el 26/V/2018. Chess.com Developer Community, 2018. https://www.chess.com/es/article/view/como-juega-alphazero-al-ajedrez Consultado el 02/11/2023.
Pazos, María Alicia y Gaytán David. “La semántica subyacente en la filosofía paraconsistente de da Costa”. Andamios Revista de investigación social 20.53 (2023): 61-90. <https://doi.org/10.29092/uacm.v20i53.1031>
Quine, Willard van Orman. “Epistemology Naturalized”. Ontological Relativity and Other Essays. Nueva York: Columbia University Press, 1969. Online. <https://doi.org/10.7312/quin92204-004>
Quine, Willard van Orman. “Two Dogmas of Empirisism, 1953”. From a Logical Point of View 2da ed. Cambridge, Massachussetts: Harvard University Press, 1980.
Steinberger, Florian. “Consequence and Normative Guidance”. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research: 98.2 (2019): 306-328. Se cita la versión editada por BIROn, Birkbeck Institutional Research Online, Reino Unido: 2017a. em <https://eprints.bbk.ac.uk/id/eprint/18703/1/Consequence%20and%20normative%20guidance%20PPR.pdf. (págs. 1-29).
Steinberger Florian. “The Normative Status of Logic”. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Ed. E. Zalta. Stanford University, 2017b. <https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/logic-normative/>
Steinberger, Florian “Three Ways in Which logic Might Be Normative”. The Journal of Philosophy 116.1 (2019): 5-31. <https://doi.org/10.5840/jphil201911611>
Wason, Peter. C. “Reasoning”. New Horizons in Psychology. Comps. B. Foss. Harmondsworth (Middlesex), Reino Unido: Penguin, 1966. 135-151.
Wason, Peter. C. “Reasoning About a Rule”. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 20.3 (1968): 273-281. <https://doi.org/10.1080/1464074680840016>
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
