Cohousing
Una alternativa comunitaria a la propiedad privada
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18270/cuaderlam.v14i27.2653Palabras clave:
Cohousing, economías comunitarias, vivienda comunitariaResumen
El artículo, busca responder desde otra visión a una de las necesidades insatisfechas de la sociedad en Colombia, el problema de acceso a la vivienda. Así, se presenta una revisión actualizada sobre el modelo de vivienda comunitaria denominado cohousing, describiéndose los principios generales del modelo y sus implicaciones económicas sobre el individuo y la comunidad que se forma, a partir de este modelo de vivienda comunitaria. Se presenta, el alcance microeconómico de estas comunidades y por último, se analiza el cohousing desde el marco institucional de los derechos de propiedad y como un fenómeno de interacción social, en el cual se generan beneficios comunales, económicos y ambientales.
Descargas
Referencias bibliográficas
Abastante, F., & Lami, I. M. (2012). Quality function deployment (QFD) and analytic network process (ANP): an application to analyze a cohousing intervention. Journal of Applied Operational Research, 14-27.
Abraham, N., Delagrange, K., & Ragland, C. (2006). Elder cohousing An idea whose time has come. Communities, 60-71.
Bamford, G. (2001). Bringing us home Cohousing and the environmental possibilities of reuniting people with neighbourhoods. Situating the Environment, 36-43.
Bamford, G. (2005). Cohousing for older people housing innovation in the Netherlands and Denmark. Australasian Journal on Ageing, 44-46.
Berggren, H. M. (2016). Cohousing as Civic Society: Cohousing Involvement and Political Participation in Massachusetts. Social Science Quarterly, 1-16.
Bouma, J., & Voorbij, L. (2009). Factors in social interaction in cohousing communities. Include London.
Brenton, M. (2008). The cohousing approach to lifetime neighbourhoods. The Housing Learning and Improvement Network.
Brenton, M. (2013). Senior cohousing communities–an alternative approach for the UK? York: Joseph Rowntree Foundation.
Buchanan, J. M. (1965). An economic theory of clubs. Economica, 32(125), 1-14.
Chiodelli, F., & Baglione, V. (2014). Living together privately for a cautious reading of cohousing. Urban Research Practice, 20-34.
Choi, J. (2013). Why Do People Move to Cohousing Communities in Sweden?-Are there any Significant Differences Between the+ 40 Cohousing and the Mixed-Age Cohousing? Architectural research, 77-86.
Choi, J. S. (2006). Preference of Common Spaces and Shared Activities in Senior Cohousing Community by Korean 50s. Urban Planning Institute of the Republic Of Slovenia. Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Choi, J. S. (2008). Characteristics of community life in foreign intentional communities focus on the differences between ecovillage and cohousing. International Journal of Human Ecology, 93-105.
Choi, J. S., & Paulsson, J. (2011). Evaluation of common activity and life in Swedish cohousing units. International Journal of Human Ecology, 133-146.
Fernández, L., Campo, A., & Morell, A. (2012). La casa abierta. Hacia una vivienda variable y sostenible concebida como silábico tanto importar. Madrid: Universidad Politécnica de Madrid. Escuela Técnica Superior de
Arquitectura de Madrid. Obtenido de http://oa.upm.es/21971/1/PABLO_FERNANDEZ_LORENZO.pdf
Glass, A. P. (2009). Aging in a community of mutual support e emergence of an elder intentional cohousing community in the United States. Journal of Housing for the Elderly, 283-303.
Hayek, F. (1988). Los errores del constructivismo. Revista Centro de Estudios Públicos, 85-106.
Jarvis, H. (2011). Saving space, sharing time integrated infrastructures of daily life in cohousing. Environment and Planning A, 560-577.
Khel, K., & en, V. (2013). Community and civil society returns of multi-generation cohousing in Germany. Journal of Civil Society, 41-57.
Mccamant, K., Durrett, C., & Hertzman, E. (1994). Cohousing: A Contemporary Approach to Housing Ourselves. Berkeley, California: Ten Speed Press.
McKenzie, E. (2003). Common#interest housing in the communities of tomorrow. Housing Policy Debate, 203-234.
Poley, L. D. (2007). Community and the habits of democratic citizenship: An investigation into civic engagement, social capital and democratic capacity-building in US cohousing neighborhoods. Tesis Doctoral. Virginia
Polytechnic Institute and State University.
Samuelson, P. A. (1954). The pure theory of public expenditure. The review of economics and statistics, 387-389.
Samuelson, P., & Nordhaus, W. (2003). Economía (Decimoséptima ed.). Madrid: McGraw-Hill.
Sanguinetti, A. (2014). Transformational practices in cohousing Enhancing residents' connection to community and nature. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 86-96.
White-Harvey, R. J. (2013). Cohousing A Scandinavian Longhouse, or a Traditional Approach to Modern Housing. The Canadian Journal of Native Studies, 69-82.
Widener, M. N. (2010). Cohousing: joining affordable, sustainable and collaboratively-governed, single family neighborhoods.
Williams, J. (2005). Designing neighbourhoods for social interaction the case of cohousing. Journal of Urban Design, 195-227.
Williams, J. (2005a). Sun, surf and sustainable housing—cohousing, the Californian experience. International Planning Studies, 145-177.
Williams, J. (2008). Predicting an American future for cohousing. Futures, 268-286.
Descargas
Publicado
Cómo citar
Número
Sección
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2019 Universidad El Bosque
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0.
Los autores cuando envían sus artículos para su evaluación certifican originalidad y transfieren los derechos de propiedad patrimonial a la RevistaCuadernos Latinoamericanos de Administración, de la Universidad El Bosque, para su difusión en forma impresa y/o electrónica. Pero la evidencia científica, la originalidad, el contenido de los documentos son de responsabilidad exclusiva y única de los autores.
